Ricerca

From raw data to defensible credit - one system, no gaps.

Most R&D credit tools are a questionnaire with a spreadsheet behind it. Ricerca is a purpose-built platform that enforces the IRC §41 statutory tests in software - collecting the evidence, screening the exclusions, computing every layer of benefit, and challenging its own work - before R&D experts review and finalize the study.

We typically reply within one business day.

Or size it yourself with the estimator

The three-pane review workbench on a study awaiting approval: headline federal and state figures, the readiness partition across 81 checks, the phase rail, and the evidence rail holding the record behind a blocking check.
The study review workbench, the wage allocation grid, and the enforced delivery steps. Real screens from the firm portal. Every figure shown is synthetic study data.

Everything above runs on this rail.

Intake to finalized study, with the gates drawn where they really are.

See how a study runs
Diagram: intake, statutory tests, computation, and expert final call, producing the federal §41 credit, state R&D credits, the §174A deduction, and the payroll tax offset INTAKE STATUTORY TESTS COMPUTATION EXPERT FINAL CALL Federal §41 credit State R&D credits §174A deduction Payroll tax offset
The client side

See it as a client

The people whose data this is get their own portal - not a PDF attached to an email six weeks later. They can see where the study stands and what has been issued to them, all the way through.

A client dashboard on a finished study: deliverables ready, the six-stage status timeline complete, candidate research expenses under review, and research expenses split by category.
Where the study stands, what is still needed, and what the expenses under review add up to. The "CPA team" named on screen is the client’s own firm, not Ricerca.
The issued document set as a client receives it: each document labelled current or superseded, with a plain-English line saying whether it is filed with a return or kept with the records.
Every issued document, marked current or superseded, and told in plain English whether it goes with the return or stays with the records. The "CPA team" named on screen is the client’s own firm, not Ricerca. Real screens from the client portal, on synthetic study data.

Your tax preparer and your leadership read the same file from the same place. What each of them receives is listed under what you receive.

Five stages, each one accountable to the last.

Data flows one way - from source systems to a finalized study - and every stage must clear before the next begins.

The stages are not a marketing diagram; they are how the software is built. A study that skips one does not exist - see how a study runs end to end for what each stage asks of your team.

  1. Collect

    01

    Payroll, general ledger, and engineering evidence flow in through secure connectors or uploads - organized automatically.

    Gate: Nothing advances until every amount traces back to a source you can point at.

  2. Substantiate

    02

    Every business component is documented against the §41 tests before a dollar is counted - the platform enforces it.

    Gate: A component with an incomplete §41 record contributes no QRE.

  3. Compute

    03

    QREs, both credit methods, state credits, and your §174A position - computed from one substantiated base.

    Gate: Both methods are computed before either one is recommended.

  4. Challenge

    04

    An independent AI examiner red-teams the study; a second model family runs compliance QC; humans resolve disagreements.

    Gate: Disagreement routes to people. The platform abstains rather than guesses.

  5. Deliver

    05

    R&D experts review and finalize. You receive the study, filing-ready forms, and an organized audit file.

    Gate: No study issues without an expert sign-off on complete substantiation.

Substantiation engine

The statute, enforced - not assumed.

Thin studies fail because qualification is asserted, not documented. Ricerca refuses to count a dollar of QRE until the §41 substantiation behind it is complete.

Where the software says no

  • At intake. Required facts are collected as structured fields, not free text an analyst has to interpret later.

  • At submission. A component that cannot answer all four parts of the test cannot be submitted as qualified.

  • Before finalization. The credit will not finalize while substantiation behind any included component is incomplete.

The portal collects employee duties and roles, component types, alternatives evaluated, supply, computer and contract screens, and trade-or-business facts as structured records - which is what makes the three gates above enforceable at all.

Two business components in the firm portal, each showing what the AI concluded, a "needs review" badge, and the count of open flags a reviewer has to clear.

Four-part test, per business component

Permitted purpose, technological in nature, elimination of uncertainty, and a process of experimentation - evaluated and documented for every business component, not asserted in bulk. The badge stays at "needs review" until the answers exist.

Rows of a wage allocation grid: each employee with a qualified percentage, the basis for it, the qualified wage figure, and an open determination.

Wages allocated row by row

Every person in the claim carries their own qualified percentage, the basis recorded for it, and the wage figure that follows - so the wage line of the workpaper is a sum of decisions, not an estimate applied to a department.

An AI-drafted qualification write-up with the four review controls beneath it: accept as written, edit the text, regenerate this section, instruct the AI.

Narratives drafted, then decided by people

AI writes the first draft of each qualification write-up. A reviewer accepts it, edits it, regenerates it, or instructs the model - and the section carries who did that and when. Nothing is issued because a model produced it.

The three delivery steps on a finalized study: generate as final, finalize and lock, issue to the client - each marked done.

Delivery in three enforced steps

Generate as final, finalize and lock, issue to the client. The order is enforced by the server rather than remembered by a person, and every pre-issuance check has to be satisfied before the first step will run.

Four excerpts from the firm portal, cropped to the part of the screen that carries the claim. Synthetic study data throughout.

All eight §41(d)(4) exclusion screens

Research after commercial production, adaptation, duplication, surveys and studies, internal-use software, foreign research, social sciences, and funded research - screened up front so excluded work never inflates the claim.

Funded research and contract analysis

Rights-and-risk analysis on contract work, the funded-research rules applied to your agreements, and contract research capped at the statutory 65% - the analysis examiners probe first.

The rules behind each screen are written up in the guide: the four-part test applied per component, which costs become qualified research expenses (including the statutory contract-research percentages), and what documentation an examiner actually asks to see.

One substantiated QRE set

Every layer of benefit is computed from the same qualified expenses, screened against the same statutory tests. Build the base once and the benefits stop contradicting each other.

The federal §41 credit, your state credits, the §41(h) payroll offset and your §174A position all read from this chain. If a figure cannot be traced back along it, it does not go in the study.

  1. Source systems: Payroll and HRIS; Ledger and engineering tickets.
  2. Evidence: Time and cost records; Contemporaneous project records.
  3. Component narratives: One per business component; Four-part test applied to each.
  4. QRE workpapers: By category and by employee; Tied to the ledger accounts.
  5. Form 6765 lines: Section A or B, and Section G; Each line tied to a workpaper.
  6. Audit-defense binder: Indexed exhibits per component; Provenance for every figure.
  7. Every number traces back to a source row
Illustrative structure of the substantiation chain behind a study. What a given engagement can evidence depends on the records it actually has.

Every layer of benefit, from one substantiated base.

Once the facts are in, the platform computes the full stack - federal, state, payroll offset, and expensing - so nothing is left behind and nothing double-counts.

Both methods, compared

The Regular Credit and the Alternative Simplified Credit are both computed so you can see the stronger result - with the §280C reduced-credit election considered in context.

§41(f) controlled groups

Related entities are aggregated as a single taxpayer, the group credit is allocated across members on QRE share, and a standalone controlled-group statement documents the determination.

Payroll-tax offset for startups

Qualified small businesses can elect under §41(h) to apply up to $500,000 per year of the credit against payroll taxes - computed and carried onto Form 8974.

State credits, same base

State R&D credits are computed from the same substantiated QRE base, with each state’s own qualification and exclusion rules applied - the benefit most studies leave behind.

§174A expensing position

Your domestic research expensing position under the new §174A is mapped alongside the credit - deduction and credit, captured together and consistently.

Prior years & amendments

Open prior years, base-period amounts, and amended-return posture are handled from the same books-and-records trail, so history and current-year positions stay consistent.

How the two methods differ - and what the §280C(c) election does to the net number - is explained in calculation methods. The startup cash path lives in the §41(h) payroll offset, the state layer in state R&D credits, and the deduction side in §174A expensing. Want a rough figure before you talk to anyone? The estimator runs entirely in your browser.

Adversarial review

The platform argues with itself, so the IRS doesn’t have to.

Before a study reaches human reviewers, it survives an adversarial gauntlet - independent AI reviewers with different model families, and a system that would rather stop than guess.

The qualification engine is also regression-tested in CI against a golden set of §41 fact patterns, with a hard gate on over-claiming - so a release can’t quietly loosen what qualifies. If a claim is ever examined, Audit Protection means we prepare the response, the documentation, and the technical defense of the study, working alongside your tax preparer.

01

Independent AI examiner

A red-team agent - a different AI model family than the one that drafted the study - challenges qualification the way an IRS examiner would, hunting for weak components before an examiner can.

02

Cross-family compliance QC

A second, independent model family re-checks the statutory tests and the math. Independence is counted by model family, so the same brain never grades its own homework.

03

Abstention gate

When reviewers disagree or substantiation is thin, the platform abstains - no study auto-issues. Open questions route to people, consistent with AICPA standards for tax positions.

04

Experts finalize

R&D experts review qualification decisions, amounts, and narratives, and finalize every study before it is issued. Approval is gated on complete §41 substantiation - the software will not let it through otherwise.

What you receive

A deliverable set built for three audiences.

Your leadership gets clarity, your preparer gets filing-ready forms, and - if it ever comes to it - an examiner gets organized, contemporaneous substantiation.

The study report

Credit summary plus rich technical narratives per business component, per employee, and per expense category - mapped to the four-part test.

Filing-ready forms

Form 6765 (Dec. 2024 revision, Sections A-G) that reconciles on its face, Form 8974 for the payroll offset, and a pro-forma Form 3800.

QRE workpapers

Wages, supplies, contract research, and cloud/computer rental - every figure traced back to payroll, GL, or invoice source.

The audit file

Contemporaneous evidence, exclusion screens, and the controlled-group and funded-research analyses - organized the way an examiner will ask for them.

From the system it comes out of, to the page of the study it lands on

From the system it comes out of, to the page of the study it lands on
What you connect or send Where it lands in the study
Payroll register and HRIS rosterThe wage allocation grid - a qualified percentage and its recorded basis on every row - footing to the wage line of the QRE workpaper and Form 6765 Section F.
General ledger detailSupply and computer-rental categories in the QRE workpaper, each figure tied back to the account it came from.
Vendor and cloud invoicesThe supply, cloud, and computer-rental lines, with the invoice retained as the exhibit behind the figure.
Contract-research agreements and statements of workThe funded-research and rights-and-risk analysis, and the contract-research line capped at the statutory 65%.
Issue tracker and source-control metadata (never source code)The contemporaneous record behind each business component narrative, and the evidence rail a reviewer opens next to it.
Short technical sessions with your engineersThe four-part-test record for each business component, and the Section G business-component detail.
Entity and ownership structureThe §41(f) controlled-group determination and the allocation statement issued with the study.
Illustrative. Which systems apply depends on your facts, and nothing is pulled from a system you do not connect.

Two front doors: your company, or your firm’s whole book.

The platform isn’t a file share with a login. Each portal is built around what that audience has to do - and shows exactly what is outstanding.

Client Portal

For companies with a Ricerca R&D tax credit study underway or on file.

  • Upload payroll, general-ledger, and project data
  • Answer technical interviews and review your narratives
  • Download your study, workpapers, and Form 6765 package
  • See exactly where your study stands and what we need next

Sign in to the Client Portal

CPA Firm Portal

For CPA and tax firms running R&D studies for their own clients with Ricerca.

  • Manage every client engagement from one dashboard
  • Invite client contacts and track outstanding requests
  • Review computations and deliverables before they are issued
  • Pull filing-ready figures and forms for the return

Sign in to the CPA Firm Portal

All sign-in destinations, including staff consoles, live on the sign-in hub. Not a client yet? Start with a free estimate.

Security & confidentiality

Built like the tax data it holds is sensitive. Because it is.

Payroll files, general ledgers, and engineering records are among the most sensitive data a company has. The platform treats them that way at every layer.

We don’t advertise certifications we don’t hold. What follows is what the system does - controls you can ask us to walk through, not badges on a wall.

Encrypted everywhere

Data is encrypted in transit and at rest, with integration tokens sealed under dedicated key encryption.

§7216 confidentiality, automated

Taxpayer-identifying data is automatically redacted before any AI processing - confidentiality enforced in code, not policy documents.

Enterprise AI routing

In production, AI calls route exclusively through enterprise Azure AI Foundry endpoints. Your data is never used to train public or third-party models.

Read-only, minimal connectors

Accounting and payroll connections are read-only; engineering connectors collect metadata only - never your source code.

Modern access control

Sign in with Microsoft 365 single sign-on, role-based access, and tenant isolation between firms and clients.

E-signed engagements

Engagement letters are signed electronically in the portal, so scope, terms, and authorization are on record before work begins.

Integrations

We meet your data where it lives.

Ricerca pulls wages, the general ledger, and engineering evidence from the tools you already use, so intake is near-effortless and every qualified dollar traces back to source. And you can always start from a secure spreadsheet, GL, or payroll export - no integration is ever required.

  • Live Connect today with a direct OAuth link
  • Rolling out Connector built - being enabled now
  • Planned On the roadmap

Accounting & ERP

QuickBooks Online connects directly today. The rest connect through our unified accounting connector - one secure, read-only link to your general ledger.

  • Live QuickBooks Online
  • Rolling out Xero
  • Rolling out NetSuite
  • Rolling out Sage Intacct
  • Rolling out Dynamics 365 Business Central
  • Rolling out FreshBooks

Payroll & HR

One secure connection reaches the major payroll and HRIS systems through one unified connector - these are the ones we see most.

  • Rolling out ADP
  • Rolling out Gusto
  • Rolling out Paychex
  • Rolling out Justworks
  • Rolling out Rippling
  • Rolling out TriNet
  • Rolling out Workday
  • Rolling out BambooHR

Engineering evidence

Contemporaneous proof of experimentation from the tools your engineers already use. Metadata only - commits, pull requests, and tickets. Never your source code.

  • Rolling out GitHub
  • Rolling out Jira
  • Planned GitLab
  • Planned Bitbucket
  • Planned Linear
  • Planned Azure DevOps

Don’t see your system? Tell us what you use - our connector layer reaches the major payroll, accounting, and HRIS platforms through one unified connector, and secure exports work today regardless.

All product names, logos, and brands are property of their respective owners, used for identification only; no endorsement is implied.

Next: how a study runs, phase by phase, or the rules the platform is applying in the §41 guide.

See the platform on your own numbers

Connect a system or upload an export, and we’ll show you what a fully substantiated study looks like - computed, challenged, and finalized by R&D experts.

[email protected] We typically reply within one business day.
Get your free credit estimate

We typically reply within one business day.